Unnatural


Plot

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Acting

Rating: 5 out of 5.

Technical Elements

Rating: 3 out of 5.

After spending quite a bit of time buried in European mysteries (namely โ€˜Murder Inโ€™ and โ€˜Unidentifiedโ€™), we decided this past week to return to one of the great producers of international detective showsโ€Šโ€”โ€ŠJapan! 

โ€œAlong with a team that also comprises a technician and a recorder, the UDI is tasked to investigate a range of baffling deaths. These include an apparent suicide that isnโ€™t quite what it seems, a โ€œpoisoningโ€ case involving an apparent heart disease victimโ€ฆand more! Will Mikoto Misumi and the gang solve all the mysteries that come before them?โ€

โ€“ Viki (Link)

โ€˜Unnaturalโ€™ (ใ‚ขใƒณใƒŠใƒใƒฅใƒฉใƒซ) tells the stories of UDI, a relatively new forensic organization that offers autopsy and forensic investigative services to the public and private sectors. The company is still working to develop relationships and trust with the public and struggles to maintain its independence and integrity in the face of pressure from its sponsors and legal partners (police and prosecution) who provide the necessary funding and networking needed to maintain operations. 

UDI is headed by Kamikura Yasuo, an older gentleman whose belief in the need for an independent program dedicated to forensic autopsy stems largely from his service during the aftermath of the 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Yasuo was called to the front lines to assist with identifying and processing remains, a job he discovered was made infinitely more difficult by an overwhelmed system, outdated technology, and insufficient medical and dental records. 

He is now devoted to building a highly advanced team of medical professionals who work alongside governmental, medical, and legal organizations to resolve cases that require a more in-depth examination. Their specialization lies in handing โ€œUnnatural Deathsโ€โ€Šโ€”โ€Šcases where the precise cause of death is technically โ€œunknownโ€ and generally listed as suicide or some form of coronary heart disease by police. According to Yasuo, 80% of all cases involving โ€˜unnatural deathsโ€™ in Japan are closed without an autopsy and the remains are cremated before further investigation can be completed. Whether the police simply lack the funding to handle the cases or whether they failed to identify signs of foul play due to an unusual cause of death, those invested have one final alternativeโ€Šโ€”โ€ŠUDI. 

In such cases, the UDI team is called in to determine whether the cause of death was accurate and if there was an underlying factor (e.g., carbon monoxide poisoning caused the heart disease). The two head specialists on the team (Misumi and Nakado) offer significant expertise, having 4,500 autopsies under their belts combined. When unidentified remains are uncovered, when families dispute the listed cause of death, or when the government is simply too overwhelmed, UDI steps in to find the answers. 


The show is relatively PG for most of the season with the more gruesome imagery (largely blood splashes) not appearing until the last couple of episodes. The show was episodic until the last two episodes as each told the story of a different victim. Within each investigation was greater discourse into a societal concern, such as bullying, ethics in journalism, vigilante justice, family relationships, and abuse of employees in the workplace. 

As with most Japanese detective shows, there is a significant combination of psychological and scientific elements to each investigation. The team frequently is forced to better understand both the victim and the assailant to identify the potential cause of death; then they turn to science to prove it. Or perhaps they identify the cause of death and use this information to provide the families with better insight into why their loved one passed on. 

In addition to the main UDI team, there is a wide array of assisting characters including the two lead police detectives who often work with UDI; the funeral director who frequently directs cases their way and assists as needed; and various medical professionals who provide their expertise or access to various public records. The acting amongst the side characters was pretty decent, and the cast as a whole was largely relatable. You come to really, REALLY loathe the main villains, but that is a sign of good storytelling. 

I will say that Misumi occasionally got on my nerves with her โ€˜holier-than-thouโ€™ approach, especially towards Nakado. She puts her nose into things and follows people around when it really goes beyond her professional role which is never attractive to me. She denigrates him and makes demands as the story progresses when she is not his superior and is not position to take that stance. While her rigid code of ethics is worth praising, she is also relatively unapologetic when that code of ethics harms her friends. Sometimes taking the ethical stance should also be accompanied with recognition and empathy for how oneโ€™s actions impact others. 

One interesting ethical commentary the viewers took away from the show was the theory that truth is more important than justice for forensic professionals. Their job was not to be responsible for the outcome of their findings but rather to present the scientific facts for the lawyers to handle. This reminds me of the recent real world case where famous forensic scientist Henry Lee was found to have fabricated evidence in multiple cases. The result was the incarceration of two teenagers for more than three decades for a crime that the court now says lacked evidence of being connected to them (Link). Unfortunately, this now calls into question his testimony at more than 8,000 cases over the years.  

The show is short but interesting; the technical effects were decent for its production level. It had some comedy mixed within but was largely a serious drama, little of the over-embellishments or over-acting that sometimes appears in Japanese shows. Certainly was a fun watch for the family of an evening and the crimes themselves were relatively well written. Some loose ends (especially at the endโ€Šโ€”โ€ŠI wonโ€™t go into those because I donโ€™t want to spoil it), but by and large the causes of death and motives were unusual and it offered something new. I think I still like Galileo or Mr. Brain better in terms of โ€˜scientific-themedโ€™ mysteries . . . but this was still a cool drama to watch. 

Have you seen Unnatural? What did you think?!

*This post may contain affiliate links


Follow us now for more mysterious reviews, stories, and recommendations!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from The Suitcase Detective

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading